Standing in the auto parts aisle, you’re faced with a choice: beam blades at $45 a pair, or conventional blades at $20. What’s the difference? Is the extra cost worth it? And which type is right for YOUR vehicle?

The wiper blade market has evolved significantly over the past two decades. Modern vehicles now predominantly come with beam blades (also called flat or frameless wipers), while conventional blades (bracket or frame wipers) have been the standard for over 60 years. Both technologies serve the same purpose — clearing rain, dust, and debris from your windscreen — but they achieve it through fundamentally different designs.

For Australian drivers, this choice matters more than you might think. Our harsh UV exposure, coastal salt spray, outback dust, and diverse climate zones place unique demands on wiper blades that aren’t addressed in generic US or European comparisons. This guide examines both technologies through an Australian lens, helping you make an informed decision based on your vehicle, driving conditions, and budget.

At UNIWIPER, we offer both types in our range because we understand that different vehicles and budgets require different solutions. However, our testing across Australian climate zones consistently shows beam blades delivering superior performance for most modern vehicles. Let’s explore why.

Visual Comparison: Beam vs Conventional at a Glance

Before diving into technical details, here’s a quick reference table comparing the two technologies:

Feature	Beam Blades	Conventional Blades
Design	Frameless, one-piece	Metal frame with pivots
Price Range	$30-60/pair	$15-35/pair
Lifespan (Australian conditions)	9-12 months	6-9 months
Best Suited For	Modern cars (2010+)	Older cars (pre-2010)
UV Resistance	Excellent (no exposed metal)	Moderate (frame can corrode)
Windscreen Fit	Conforms to curved glass	Better for flat windscreens
Aerodynamics	Superior (low profile)	Can lift at high speeds
Appearance	Sleek, modern	Traditional
Best Conditions	All-weather, coastal	Mild climates, budget use

What Are Conventional Wiper Blades?

Conventional wiper blades represent the original wiper blade technology that has served drivers for over six decades. Understanding their design helps explain both their continued use and their limitations on modern vehicles.

Design and Structure

A conventional wiper blade consists of several key components working together:

• Metal frame (bracket): The structural backbone, typically made from painted or coated steel
• Pivot points: Usually 4-8 hinged connections along the frame length
• Rubber blade: The wiping element, attached to the frame via clips or slots
• Spring tension system: Creates downward pressure at each pivot point

This design has remained largely unchanged since its introduction because it solved the fundamental challenge: distributing the wiper arm’s pressure across the length of the blade. The pivots allow the frame to articulate, theoretically following the windscreen’s contour.

How They Work

The operational principle is straightforward: the wiper arm presses down on the center of the metal frame, and the frame’s pivot points distribute this pressure to 4-8 discrete locations along the blade length. Each pivot acts as a pressure point where the rubber makes contact with the windscreen. The pivots’ articulation allows the blade to maintain contact as it sweeps across the windscreen’s surface.

This system works effectively on relatively flat windscreens — the type common in vehicles manufactured before the 2000s. However, modern windscreen design has created challenges that expose the limitations of this traditional approach.

Advantages of Conventional Blades

Despite being older technology, conventional blades retain several legitimate advantages that keep them relevant:

• Lower upfront cost: Budget-friendly option at $15-35 per pair, making them accessible for cost-conscious buyers
• Wide availability: Found at virtually every auto parts store, service station, and retailer in Australia
• Proven reliability: Decades of real-world use have validated the basic design
• Easy fitment for older vehicles: Standard clip systems work with vehicles dating back decades
• Adequate performance on flat windscreens: Works well for pre-2000s vehicles with less curved glass
• Simple replacement: Straightforward installation with intuitive clip mechanisms

Disadvantages of Conventional Blades

The weaknesses of conventional blades become particularly apparent in Australian conditions:

• Exposed metal frame: Vulnerable to rust and corrosion, especially problematic in coastal regions where 85% of Australians live
• UV degradation: Australian sun attacks both the rubber blade and the metal frame, accelerating deterioration
• Limited pressure points: Only 4-8 contact points can leave unwiped “dead zones” on curved modern windscreens
• Poor aerodynamics: The bulky frame catches wind at highway speeds (80+ km/h), causing the blade to lift off the windscreen
• Dust accumulation: Outback and rural driving causes dust to clog pivot points, reducing effectiveness
• Shorter lifespan: Typically 6-9 months in Australian conditions before performance degrades noticeably
• Ineffective on curved windscreens: Struggle to maintain even contact on the complex curvatures of post-2010 vehicles

What Are Beam Wiper Blades?

Beam wiper blades represent a fundamental redesign of how a wiper blade functions. Introduced in the 1990s and widely adopted in the 2000s, they address the limitations of conventional blades through innovative engineering.

Design and Structure

Beam blades take a radically different approach to blade construction:

• Frameless one-piece design: No external metal frame or exposed components
• Internal spring steel flexor: Pre-curved spring steel strip runs the entire blade length
• Molded rubber shell: Rubber blade and protective cover molded over the steel core as a single unit
• Sealed construction: All metal components protected inside the rubber housing

This design eliminates the hinged frame entirely, replacing multiple discrete pivot points with a continuous flexible structure. The result is a sleek, low-profile blade that looks dramatically different from traditional wipers.

How They Work

The operational principle differs fundamentally from conventional blades. Instead of distributing pressure through pivot points, the pre-curved spring steel creates what engineers call “infinite pressure points.” The entire length of the blade maintains even contact with the windscreen through the natural spring tension of the curved steel flexor.

As the wiper sweeps across the windscreen, the flexible steel continuously adapts to the glass curvature without requiring hinged pivots. The pre-curved shape matches the curvature of modern windscreens, ensuring consistent contact from edge to edge. The low-profile design also creates an aerodynamic advantage — wind pressure actually pushes the blade down onto the windscreen rather than lifting it away.

Advantages of Beam Blades

The benefits of beam blade technology become especially pronounced in demanding Australian conditions:

• Superior windscreen contact: Infinite pressure points versus 4-8 discrete points means no dead zones
• Optimized for modern windscreens: Pre-curved design matches the complex curvatures of post-2010 vehicles
• Corrosion-resistant: No exposed metal means coastal salt spray cannot corrode critical components
• Enhanced UV protection: Sealed design protects internal components from UV damage; only the rubber surface is exposed
• Aerodynamic performance: Low profile prevents wind lift at 100+ km/h highway speeds
• Extended lifespan: Typically 9-12 months in Australian conditions — 50% longer than conventional blades
• Modern appearance: Sleek design complements contemporary vehicle styling
• Consistent performance: No pivot points means nothing to freeze, clog with dust, or corrode
• All-weather capability: Excel in heavy rain, coastal salt, and outback dust conditions

Disadvantages of Beam Blades

Honesty requires acknowledging the downsides:

• Higher upfront cost: Typically $30-60 per pair compared to $15-35 for conventional blades
• Fewer budget options: Less price competition in the ultra-budget segment
• Potential overkill for flat windscreens: Very old vehicles with flat glass may not benefit from the advanced design

Technical Comparison: How Design Differences Impact Performance

Understanding the engineering differences helps explain why beam blades perform better in most real-world scenarios.

Pressure Distribution

Conventional blades create 4-8 discrete pressure points where the pivots concentrate force. Between these points, the blade relies on the rubber’s natural stiffness to maintain contact. As the rubber ages and softens, gaps form between pressure points — the dreaded streaking pattern. On highly curved windscreens, the limited articulation of the pivots means some areas receive inadequate pressure, leaving water residue even when the blade is new.

Beam blades distribute pressure continuously across the entire blade length. The spring steel flexor acts as infinite pressure points, maintaining consistent contact regardless of windscreen curvature. As the blade wears, the spring tension remains constant, ensuring even pressure throughout the blade’s service life. This explains why beam blades maintain effective wiping performance much longer than conventional blades.

Aerodynamics and Speed Performance

Highway driving exposes a critical weakness in conventional blade design. The bulky metal frame acts as an airfoil in reverse — air flowing over it creates lift that pulls the blade away from the windscreen. At 80+ km/h, this wind lift significantly reduces wiping effectiveness. At 110 km/h (typical Australian highway speed), conventional blades often vibrate or chatter, and heavy rain performance degrades noticeably.

Beam blades’ streamlined profile works with aerodynamics, not against them. The low-profile design minimizes wind resistance, and the curved shape actually channels airflow to create downforce. This pushes the blade onto the windscreen with increasing pressure as speed increases. The result: quiet, effective wiping at any speed, including 120+ km/h interstate driving.

Durability in Australian Conditions

Australia presents unique challenges that accelerate wiper blade failure:

UV exposure: Our intense sun breaks down rubber compounds through oxidation. Conventional blades suffer double damage — UV attacks both the rubber blade and degrades the protective coating on the metal frame, leading to rust. Beam blades’ sealed construction means UV only affects the rubber surface; internal components remain protected.

Coastal salt: With 85% of the population living within 50km of the coast, salt spray is a universal concern. Conventional blade frames corrode rapidly in coastal environments — the metal frame is directly exposed to salt-laden air. Rust forms at pivot points first, causing binding that reduces wiping effectiveness. Beam blades have no exposed metal, making them essentially immune to salt corrosion.

Outback dust: Fine red dust infiltrates conventional blade pivot points, acting like grinding paste that wears both the hinges and the rubber. The dust also prevents full articulation, reducing pressure point effectiveness. Beam blades’ sealed design prevents dust infiltration entirely.

The net result: conventional blades typically last 6-9 months in Australian conditions, while quality beam blades like UNIWIPER’s achieve 9-12 months or longer. The 50% lifespan advantage significantly narrows the cost gap.

Windscreen Curvature Compatibility

Vehicle design has evolved dramatically since conventional blades were invented. Pre-2000 windscreens were relatively flat, with simple curves that conventional blade pivots could accommodate. Modern windscreens feature complex compound curves optimized for aerodynamics, visibility, and styling — curves that 4-8 pivot points simply cannot follow effectively.

Conventional blades on modern curved windscreens leave characteristic unwiped zones between pivot points. You’ll notice vertical streaks spaced evenly across the windscreen — these are the gaps between pressure points where the blade fails to maintain contact.

Beam blades were engineered specifically for modern windscreen curvatures. The pre-curved spring steel matches the windscreen profile out of the box, and the continuous flexibility adapts to any contour. This is why virtually all vehicles manufactured after 2015 come with beam blades as original equipment — it’s not marketing, it’s engineering necessity.

All-Weather Performance

Australia’s climate diversity tests wiper blades across extremes:

Heavy downpours: Tropical Queensland and monsoon-affected Northern Territory experience intense rainfall that overwhelms conventional blades’ limited pressure points. Water skips over unwiped zones, reducing visibility when it matters most. Beam blades’ continuous contact clears water effectively even in deluge conditions.

Dust storms: Inland Australia’s dust storms deposit fine particles on windscreens. Conventional blades with clogged pivots smear dust rather than clearing it. Beam blades maintain consistent pressure and clearing effectiveness.

Coastal conditions: Salt spray, morning dew, and high humidity combine with UV exposure to create the harshest environment for conventional blades. Beam blades’ sealed, corrosion-proof design handles coastal conditions without degradation.

Cost Analysis: Which Offers Better Value?

Price tags tell only part of the story. True value requires examining total cost of ownership.

Upfront Cost Comparison

Walking into an auto parts store, the price difference is stark:

• Conventional blades: $15-35 per pair
• Beam blades: $30-60 per pair

On the surface, beam blades cost approximately twice as much. For budget-constrained buyers, this appears to be the end of the discussion. However, upfront cost and value are different calculations.

Lifespan in Australian Conditions

Real-world testing across Australian climate zones reveals significant lifespan differences:

• Conventional blades: 6-9 months average before performance degrades noticeably
• Quality beam blades: 9-12 months average with maintained performance

The sealed design and corrosion resistance of beam blades translates directly to longer service life. The difference becomes even more pronounced in coastal areas, where conventional blade frames corrode aggressively.

Cost Per Month of Ownership

Let’s calculate the real cost using typical prices and realistic lifespans:

Conventional blades:

$25 per pair ÷ 7 months average lifespan = $3.57 per month

UNIWIPER beam blades:

$45 per pair ÷ 10 months average lifespan = $4.50 per month

The monthly cost difference is less than $1. For that dollar per month, you receive:

• Superior wiping performance throughout the blade’s life
• Better visibility in heavy rain
• Quiet operation at highway speeds
• No corrosion or rust concerns
• Fewer shopping trips and replacements

The Hidden Costs

Total cost includes factors beyond the price tag:

Safety implications: Conventional blades’ degraded performance in heavy rain represents a genuine safety risk. Poor visibility contributes to accidents. What’s the value of clear vision when it matters most?

Time and convenience: Replacing blades twice as often means twice as many shopping trips, twice as many installation sessions, and ongoing monitoring of blade condition. Your time has value.

Windscreen damage prevention: Worn blades with exposed frame metal can scratch windscreen glass, leading to repair costs that dwarf the price of quality blades.

Verdict: Which Is Better Value?

For most Australian drivers with post-2010 vehicles, beam blades deliver superior value despite higher upfront cost. The combination of better performance, longer lifespan, and enhanced safety makes the additional dollar per month a sound investment.

Conventional blades remain the better choice only when budget constraints are absolute, or for older vehicles with flat windscreens that don’t benefit from beam blade advantages.

Which Type Should YOU Choose?

The right choice depends on your specific vehicle, driving conditions, and priorities.

Choose BEAM BLADES If:

• ✅ You drive a modern vehicle (2010 or newer) with curved windscreen
• ✅ You live in coastal areas (within 50km of the ocean)
• ✅ You drive on highways regularly or value high-speed performance
• ✅ You experience heavy rain, dust storms, or harsh weather
• ✅ You want maximum lifespan (9-12 months)
• ✅ You prioritize safety and visibility over initial savings
• ✅ You prefer fewer replacements and maintenance

Recommended: UNIWIPER Beam Blades — specifically engineered for Australian conditions with graphite-treated rubber, universal adapters, and testing across all climate zones.

Choose CONVENTIONAL BLADES If:

• ✅ You drive an older vehicle (pre-2010) with relatively flat windscreen
• ✅ Your budget is extremely tight ($20-25 maximum per pair)
• ✅ You drive infrequently (low annual mileage)
• ✅ You’re comfortable with more frequent replacements (6-9 months)
• ✅ Your climate is genuinely mild (not coastal, not tropical, not outback)
• ✅ You don’t drive at highway speeds regularly

Important note: Even for older vehicles, beam blades still perform better — this is a budget versus performance decision, not a compatibility issue.

Decision Framework

Follow this logic tree:

1. Is your car newer than 2010?

• YES: Beam blades are the optimal choice
• NO: Continue to question 2

1. Is your windscreen noticeably curved?

• YES: Beam blades strongly recommended
• NO: Continue to question 3

1. Is budget your absolute priority?

• YES: Conventional blades acceptable (short-term solution)
• NO: Beam blades offer better long-term value

Australian-Specific Considerations

Our unique conditions create performance differences that don’t appear in overseas comparisons.

UV Resistance

Australia receives the world’s highest UV exposure. Darwin experiences UV index 12+ for much of the year; even southern cities like Melbourne and Adelaide regularly hit UV 10+. This intense radiation degrades rubber compounds through oxidation and breaks down protective coatings on metal.

Conventional blades suffer dual attack — UV damages the rubber blade while also degrading the frame’s protective coating, leading to accelerated rust. The pivot points, where coating wears through mechanical movement, rust first.

Beam blades concentrate UV exposure on the rubber surface only. The internal spring steel remains sealed and protected. UNIWIPER beam blades use graphite-treated rubber compounds specifically formulated for high-UV environments, extending service life beyond standard formulations.

Winner: Beam blades — significantly better UV protection for both rubber and structure.

Coastal Driving (Salt Corrosion)

Eighty-five percent of Australians live within 50km of the coast, where salt-laden air is a daily reality. Even if you don’t drive to the beach, salt spray travels inland on prevailing winds, settling on vehicles overnight.

For conventional blades, this is devastating. The exposed metal frame corrodes rapidly, with rust appearing within months in truly coastal locations. Pivot points bind as rust builds up, reducing articulation and pressure point effectiveness. Once rust begins, degradation accelerates.

Beam blades have no exposed metal. Salt spray contacts only rubber surfaces, which resist corrosion entirely. After years of coastal use, beam blades show no structural degradation — only normal rubber wear.

Winner: Beam blades — essential for coastal driving, which describes most Australian motorists.

Outback/Rural Driving (Dust)

Inland Australia’s fine red dust infiltrates everything. For conventional wiper blades, dust accumulates in pivot points, acting like grinding paste. This abrasive wear damages both the metal hinges and the rubber blade. Dust also prevents full pivot articulation, reducing contact pressure at the blade tips.

Beam blades’ sealed construction prevents dust infiltration. The solid one-piece design has no gaps where dust can accumulate. Performance remains consistent even after extended dusty conditions.

Winner: Beam blades — significantly better dust resistance for rural and outback driving.

Highway Driving

Australian highway speeds range from 100-110 km/h, with rural roads occasionally allowing 130 km/h. At these speeds, aerodynamics matter significantly.

Conventional blades’ frame design creates wind lift. At 100+ km/h, the blade can actually rise off the windscreen, vibrating and chattering. Wiping effectiveness drops precisely when you need it most — during highway rain events.

Beam blades’ low-profile design channels airflow to create downforce. Wind pressure increases contact pressure rather than reducing it. The result: quiet, effective wiping at any legal Australian highway speed.

Winner: Beam blades — essential for regular highway driving.

Common Myths Debunked

Misconceptions about wiper blade technology lead to poor purchasing decisions.

Myth: “Conventional Blades Work Just As Well”

Reality: This was true for vehicles with flat windscreens (pre-2000s), but modern windscreen design has changed the equation. On today’s curved windscreens, beam blades demonstrably outperform conventional blades in objective testing. The difference isn’t subtle — it’s the difference between clear vision and streaky residue.

Myth: “Beam Blades Are Just Marketing Hype”

Reality: This represents genuine engineering advancement, not marketing. The proof: over 90% of vehicles manufactured after 2015 come with beam blades as original equipment. Automotive engineers specify beam blades because they solve real technical challenges that conventional blades cannot. OEM adoption reflects performance reality, not advertising budgets.

Myth: “The Extra Cost Isn’t Worth It”

Reality: Cost-per-month calculations show the gap is minimal (less than $1/month), while performance differences are substantial. The “extra cost” buys 50% longer lifespan, better visibility in rain, no corrosion, and quieter operation. For the price of one coffee per month, you get significantly better safety and convenience.

Myth: “Beam Blades Don’t Fit Older Cars”

Reality: Universal adapter kits (included with UNIWIPER beam blades) enable fitment to 95%+ of vehicles, regardless of age. The question isn’t whether beam blades fit your older car — they do. The question is whether your older car’s flat windscreen needs beam blade advantages. Often the answer is still yes, but fitment is not the barrier.

What the Experts Say

Automotive Industry Consensus

The evidence is clear: over 90% of new vehicles now come with beam blades as original equipment. This OEM adoption didn’t happen because of cost — beam blades are more expensive to manufacture. It happened because modern windscreen designs require the continuous contact that only beam blades provide.

Engineers designing today’s vehicles specify beam blades because conventional blades physically cannot maintain adequate contact on complex curved windscreens. This is engineering reality, not preference.

Australian Driver Experience

Real-world feedback from Australian drivers consistently highlights several themes:

• “Should have upgraded years ago” — the most common reaction after switching to beam blades
• Surprise at the performance difference, especially in heavy rain
• Appreciation for the extended lifespan, particularly in coastal areas
• Quiet operation compared to chattering conventional blades at highway speeds

Negative feedback is rare and typically relates to initial cost sensitivity, not performance dissatisfaction.

UNIWIPER’s Beam Blade Advantage

Not all beam blades are created equal. UNIWIPER beam blades are specifically engineered for Australian conditions:

• Australian climate testing: Validated across tropical, coastal, temperate, and arid Australian climate zones
• Graphite-treated rubber: Superior UV resistance compared to standard rubber formulations
• Universal adapter kit included: Fits 95%+ of vehicles without additional purchases
• Optimized pre-curve: Matches typical Australian vehicle windscreen profiles
• Extended lifespan: 10-12 months achievable in Australian conditions with proper care
• Mid-range pricing: Better value than premium international brands
• Australian-based support: Local customer service and warranty support

We don’t just import generic beam blades and slap a label on them. Our rubber compounds are formulated specifically for Australian UV exposure, and our pre-curve profiles are optimized for the vehicles Australians actually drive.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are beam blades better than conventional blades?

For most drivers, yes — especially those with modern vehicles (post-2010). Beam blades provide superior windscreen contact, better aerodynamics, longer lifespan in Australian conditions, and resistance to UV and salt corrosion. The performance advantage is particularly noticeable on curved windscreens, in heavy rain, and at highway speeds. Conventional blades remain adequate for older vehicles with flat windscreens where budget is the primary concern.

Can I use beam blades on an old car?

Absolutely. Universal adapter kits (included with UNIWIPER beam blades) enable fitment to virtually any vehicle, regardless of age. Whether you should depends on your windscreen type and budget. If your older car has a curved windscreen, beam blades will still perform better. Even with a flat windscreen, beam blades offer advantages like corrosion resistance and longer lifespan. The main consideration is whether the performance improvement justifies the higher cost for your specific situation.

Why are beam blades more expensive?

Manufacturing complexity. Conventional blades are simple: stamp out a metal frame, clip on a rubber blade — done. Beam blades require precision-curved spring steel, specialized rubber molding processes, and quality control to ensure the pre-curve matches windscreen profiles. The sealed one-piece construction also requires more sophisticated tooling. However, the manufacturing cost difference is partially offset by longer lifespan, making the cost-per-month gap quite small.

Do beam blades last longer?

Yes, significantly. In Australian conditions, quality beam blades typically last 9-12 months compared to 6-9 months for conventional blades. The sealed design protects internal components from UV, salt, and dust damage. With no exposed metal frame, there’s no corrosion to cause structural failure. The spring steel maintains consistent tension throughout the blade’s life, while conventional blade pivots can bind or weaken. The lifespan advantage is even more pronounced in coastal areas.

Will beam blades fit my car?

Almost certainly. Universal adapter kits included with quality beam blades (like UNIWIPER’s) fit 95%+ of vehicles. The adapter system accommodates the various wiper arm connection types used across different manufacturers and model years. Check your current blade’s connection type (typically hook, pin, bayonet, or side-pin) and verify the adapter kit includes that type. For unusual or commercial vehicles, check compatibility before purchasing.

Are conventional blades still worth buying?

In specific circumstances, yes. If you drive an older vehicle with a flat windscreen infrequently, and budget is extremely tight, conventional blades remain adequate. They still perform their basic function of clearing water from glass. However, for regular drivers, modern vehicles, coastal areas, or highway driving, the small price premium for beam blades delivers substantial value through better performance and longer lifespan.

Can I mix beam and conventional blades on the same car?

Technically yes, but it’s not recommended. Mixing blade types creates uneven windscreen contact pressure and different wiping patterns, which can leave streaks. The blades also wear at different rates, creating maintenance confusion. Consistent blade types ensure predictable performance and wear. If budget allows only one blade upgrade, prioritize the driver’s side for improved visibility in critical situations.

Final Verdict: Beam Blades Win for Most Australian Drivers

After examining both technologies through the lens of Australian driving conditions, the conclusion is clear: beam blades deliver superior performance and value for the vast majority of Australian drivers.

The case is strongest for:

• Modern vehicles (2010 or newer) with curved windscreens — beam blades are essential, not optional
• Coastal residents (85% of Australians) — corrosion resistance alone justifies the investment
• Highway drivers — aerodynamic performance and quiet operation matter at 100+ km/h
• Value-conscious buyers — when lifespan is factored in, cost-per-month is comparable

Conventional blades retain relevance only for:

• Older vehicles with genuinely flat windscreens
• Extremely tight budgets where even an extra $20 is prohibitive
• Very infrequent driving (less than 5,000km annually)

Even in these scenarios, beam blades still perform better — it becomes a question of whether the performance improvement justifies the cost for your specific circumstances.

For Australian conditions specifically — our harsh UV, coastal salt spray, outback dust, and diverse climate zones — beam blades’ sealed, corrosion-resistant, aerodynamic design delivers measurable advantages that conventional blades simply cannot match. The technology gap is real, not imagined.

UNIWIPER beam blades bridge the gap between budget conventional blades and premium international brands, offering Australian-optimized performance at fair pricing. Our graphite-treated rubber compounds withstand Australian UV exposure, our universal adapters ensure broad compatibility, and our testing across Australian climate zones validates real-world performance.

If you’re driving a modern vehicle, live near the coast, or regularly experience heavy rain or dusty conditions, the choice is clear. Upgrade to beam blades. The improved visibility, safety, and convenience are worth far more than the modest price premium.

Ready to upgrade? Explore the full UNIWIPER beam blade range, with detailed fitment information and Australian-specific testing results. Your windscreen — and your safety — deserve the best technology available.